Madam Jenny's

Promoting Safe and Reliable Online Employment, Retail Shopping and More.


Collection of blogs for Jenny’s Rants & Raves, Doc’s Discussions, Fancifully Healthy, eMoney for the Frugal Shopper, Beliefs, Mother Nature’s Everything and other pages.

view:  full / summary

DNC is trying to Scare Pregnant Women into being DNC Pawns

Posted by Jenny Lee on January 31, 2017 at 5:50 AM Comments comments (0)

Here is a new one, the DNC is now sending out emails and scaring pregnant women. They bring up a family, no names, no date, no specific insurance company and claim the insurance company was not going to pay their medical bills because a premature baby is considered a “pre-existing condition”. So, I searched insurance company policies dated before October 31, 2007, over a year before the Affordable Care Act went into effect. Did not find any insurance company who would not cover a premature baby. Now there were a few families who did not recieve coverage for the newborn baby at the time of birth, but it had nothing to do with the condition of their newborn. It was because the parents did not follow their policies instructions and inform the insurance company of their newborn baby within 30 days of the baby’s birth. Then, at that point, if the baby was born healthy the infant was added to the insurance, but the parents were responsible for any medical fees that occurred before the baby was insured.  If the baby was born with a medical condition they were dealing with a higher or no coverage for the pre-existing condition. The initial loss of insurance was due to the parents not doing their part within 30 days.


Thus far, Trump and the GOP have not threatened to eliminate the requirement for insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions. If anything they have repeatedly reassured the people by at least saying they believe people should not be rejected by insurance companies for pre-existing conditions. Trump and GOP are looking at tearing down the Affordable Care Act, but they don’t plan to eliminate every single portion of it. Specific regulations may have to go through Congress again, but only time will tell.


However, the DNC should not be scaring pregnant women across the US with their farfetched predictions. If you are worried about the DNC predictions, call or email your current health insurance provider. Ask them if by some slim chance the GOP allowed insurance companies to deny insurance for pre-existing issues would it include a pre-mature birth and/or any birth defects. If you call them on the phone, make sure to write down the operator’s name and request their response to be sent to you on paper for your own records. Just because a political party said it, doesn’t mean one should jump out of their seat and instantly believe it.


No one should say how much is too much Money

Posted by Jenny Lee on January 6, 2017 at 9:30 AM Comments comments (0)


Whether people want to admit it or not, money is a huge incentive. Companies would not find willing people to not only oversee a huge company, but they would not want to take the legal risks of doing so, for a small income. At the end of the day who truly has the right to say how much is too much? I have the chance to earn as much money as I can achieve, should the government give me limits and only allow me to earn so much per year? If so, there is no need for me to put my full effort into my work. I might as well only put in as much as I need to reach my income limit. People need to stop being jealous of others and start paying more attention to their own efforts.



"Fake News" at Social Sites

Posted by Jenny Lee on November 29, 2016 at 7:00 AM Comments comments (0)

Hillary Clinton loses the election and one of the many things to blame is social sites having “false news”. I don’t go to Facebook or Google+ to read the news, I go there to see what my friends and acquaintances are talking about. In a sense, social sites are the new coffee shops and breakfast nooks where the same people sit each day and talk about what is going on in the news, in town or whatever floats their boats. The difference is everyone is either chatting with their computers, cell phones or other online devices instead of spending hours sitting at a booth at Denny’s.


They also have the ability to talk to people all over the world. When the 2014 Winter Olympics took place in Russia I had the chance to chat with people at social sites who lived in and around Sochi. People who were able to enjoy full internet access for over 24 hours straight for a change and enjoyed having the ability to surf the net with less of the usual government censoring. During the coup in Egypt I chatted with people who managed to leave the area before all the violence erupted and others who watched it from their balcony.


I am able to be online friends with people from who knows how many different countries, and numerous social sites to choose from with numerous set ups. Like big picture books, hang out at Pinterest. Like to read headlines, head on over to Twitter. Like to converse, see pictures, videos all in one local, go to Facebook or Google+ and many other options.


However, there are two main groups who dislike this huge method of worldwide communication, the Mainstream Media and Big Government. When it comes to the Mainstream Media: lying, fidgeting the truth around a bit, leaving out little tidbits of info, over dramatizing and totally making crap up is not as easy an option. For decades, the media has been able to fidget the national news. Who would complain and even if someone did complain who would they tell? Now a days, people can watch the news and when it is a pile of lies they can log into their favorite social site and let everyone know what really happened and everyone who sees it can share it until everyone else knows about it. The mainstream media doesn’t like others fact checking their work. When it comes to Big Government, controlling the people with lies and propaganda is not easy when they are all talking to each other and finding out what’s, what.


So, without winning an election, the Democrats have managed to make private companies rethink their social sites and talk about “fake news” and whether it should be banned. What makes up fake news? Will satire sites end up blocked? How about blogs, will their opinions end up blocked from social sites? Talk about making a social site boring. Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and every other social site has the freedom to make restrictions, but at some point in time their participants will take advantage of their freedom to choose and hang out at other social sites. Without participants all those private owned social sites won’t make near as much money as they are making now. However, social sites who maintain freedom of speech within their company guidelines may see an increase in their participants.


Liberals think an ID to Vote is Racist, but have no Problem deciding who should have the Right to Vote

Posted by Jenny Lee on November 20, 2016 at 9:10 PM Comments comments (0)

I had such a disturbing conversation with someone the other evening. I am a Ph.D. student at a major University in Texas. I was on campus on the evening of November 9th. This was the same day that they announced Trump as our upcoming President-Elect earlier that morning. I had to go to a student organization meeting I am a part of. I ran into a few people I know in the hall. I stopped to talk to them a little bit and they immediately began talking about the election…go figure! The election results had shocked the nation a bit, so naturally people will talk about it! The conversation that follows was very disturbing and utterly shocking. (I wish to express a large and important disclaimer! I would have been just as shocked if someone had said this about the Trump party if Hillary had won!)

Me: Hey, how has your night been?

Friend: Good…really bummed about the election though!

Me: I am on the fence about this. I am going to try to stay as optimistic as I can regardless of who is president.

Friend: Yea, that is probably the best way to look at it.

[Small Pause]

Friend: Did you hear? So-and-so decided to run an analysis of the demographic data that has been recorded so far. If you were to have taken all of the voters to have voted in the 18-25 demographic, Hillary would have won with the electoral college by over 500 votes.

Me: Wow, no, I did not hear that statistic.

Friend: Yea! Crazy right! I mean, we are the voice of the future; we are the ones that should have a louder voice than everyone else right now. Our voice, our vote, it should count more towards an election. We are living in and with all of the problems that this country has more so than any other demographic and we will be here longer…so our voice, our vote, or ideas should be heard a bit louder than everyone else’s. Right?

Me: [Silence]…..*thinking to myself: thank god I am leaning against a wall…I might have just fallen over…how do I respond to this…what do I say that won’t make me sound mean? This poor creature…this poor poor thing…bless their heart?”

Friend: Right?

Me: Yea, I guess I, yea, I mean, yea…*no idea how to respond in a nice way…*

Friend: I know; this election has torn me to shreds.

The other person that was with my “friend” had been nodding their head in agreement the entire time this conversation was taking place.

After I got over the initial shock, I had to depart to get to my meeting (thankfully!). I said my quick goodbyes and walked down the hall to my meeting in a bit of a daze. I am still in shock that this conversation took place. I am in shock that this is the ideologies, the thought processes, the notions, the “lightbulb” moments that are taking place in the “18-25 demographic”. HOW is this possible? I am not too far away from their age group…but I surely realize how completely asinine and foolish this individual sounded! I know this person has no idea what they just said!

I can hope that this person will look back at this specific conversation when they are no longer in their 18-25 demographic bracket and realize how unbelievably ignorant and naïve they sounded and acted! They definitely acted their age! This says a lot about the protests that are currently happening on Universities and colleges around the country with this election. They are happening on the campus I am trying to get my Ph.D. from. They are happening because of the 18-25 demographic! It is scary!! AND! This has nothing to do with Hillary supporters! The Trump supporters are in the same category! They are spitting out hate speech, telling LEGAL immigrants to go home…seriously?! The entire demographic needs a big bite of what is known as R-E-A-L-I-T-Y! Once they get it, they need to look back at their insignificant life they were leading before that bite came along. Maybe then they will realize they were acting ignorant!

I want to stress something very important. I am not saying the 18-25 demographic in its entirety has the same ideologies as these people do. No! I am saying that a very large, outspoken, and destructive portion of this demographic has these beliefs. That in itself is where the fear sets in. That fear has been boiling under the surface within the older demographics for some time now. That fear is finally coming through because that large portion of the 18-25 demographic is acting on what we have feared…acting more violently, more naively, more ignorantly, and more frequently.

This election has proven one thing…whether you are a Trump fan or a Hillary fan. There is no “right” president. There is not a “perfect” president. Let us be honest here…a lot of people voted for Hillary or for Trump because, in their minds, they were voting for the “lesser of two evils”…whichever way the cookie crumbled for them. However, the one thing that we must all agree on in order to come out of this election much stronger is…

…We must agree that we can evolve. We can adapt. We can accept. From this day forward for at least the next 4 years, regardless of if we voted for Trump or Clinton…Trump is going to be our new President of the United States of America. There is nothing we can do to change that! A lot of people did not want the Obama administration to take on a second term! A lot of people were furious when he managed to capture the spot for another 4 years. BUT, we accepted that…we had to. We must do that this time around…we must unite or we will rip our country apart. That is unacceptable!

Written By: T. Anon


Cry Baby Society

Posted by Jenny Lee on November 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM Comments comments (0)

Not even 24 hours after the election and protests have not only started, but many of them quickly turned into riots. Guess those rioting don’t remember 2008 and 2012. They may have won then, but others lost the election and attacking fellow Americans was not the result. Who knows, maybe the Democrat Party was not happy with a non-violent result and why they pushed so hard to create racial barriers as often as possible. With every occurrence of a white individual causing the death of a black individual the Democrat Administration went out of their way to make a city, state or county incident a federal affair. Instigating protests and violence among Americans before any of the facts were brought to light. The current social division is not a result of an individual who just won an election a few days ago, but 8 years of big government instigating division, violence and hatred within society. 


Deplorables came together to win the 2016 Election

Posted by Jenny Lee on November 9, 2016 at 9:30 AM Comments comments (0)

Donald Trump managed to receive a large chunk of votes from Democrats. Throughout the election Trump attacked his opponents, something that has occurred since the start of the political system in any country, but the media acted like he was the bully. Hillary Clinton on the other hand, not only attacked her opponent, but she also attacked the voters who favored her opponent. Don’t claim to represent all the people, and then turn around and attack some of those same people. She created the Deplorables and it came back to haunt her.

Before someone tosses in Trump attacked Muslims, Hispanics and whoever else, he verbally attacked people who are not eligible to vote in the USA. He disrespected illegal immigrants and refugees without background checks, not eligible USA voters and legal immigrants. When he said something negative about “women” he was referring to a specific woman, not all women across the USA. If a woman has the freedom and the right to insult a specific man, men have the same freedom and right to do the same. During Hillary’s campaign she tossed her woman card around, and simultaneously divided the nation by gender, but that is okay, she is a woman and she is a Democrat. Don’t preach equality and unification while drawing lines in the sand. 

Only Black Folks Riot

Posted by Jenny Lee on October 16, 2016 at 8:10 PM Comments comments (0)

I was doing an image search for background scenes of rioters. I wanted to set up an inspirational meme and I felt a riot scene would work. I didn’t specify race or gender. The only specification was in America. My exact search was “rioters, America”. The results included people of all racial backgrounds, and a few included people dressed in costumes, mainly clowns. Either way I noticed a number of photos were linked to pages that had the phrase “Double Standard” in the title, so I finally decided to click on a few and see what it was all about.


It turned out it spoke about how riots started by mainly black folk make national news and are dragged through the coals by viewers, but riots started by mainly white folk are not dragged through the coals on a national level. The blogs all seemed to blame white people in general. I hate to break it to people, but the viewers, including white folk, don’t have a whole lot of control on what is or is not reported on a national level. At the end of the day what makes national news is not what the viewers are choosing or not choosing, but whoever is ultimately in charge of the mainstream media and when I say mainstream media I mean the original top newsfeeds ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox News. Fox is not quite original but it still managed to make it up there. CNN and Headline News managed to make that top group of newsfeeds also. Now, I have no clue if there is some ultimate group of people who say what is or is not considered national news, or if there is another group in charge of that group and so on. Those running the US Government behind the curtains may hold the power. Hell, for all I know the main influence comes from those in power of the United Nations or maybe England never fully released its grasp on America after the Revolution. Whoever the ultimate group in power happens to be, it will never be made public, at least not on purpose. If it were made public they would instantly be a target by someone or some other group, it would open the doors to numerous legal issues and so on.


Knowing who is or is not in power in some global level is not important at the moment. (I say global because “race baiting” and most of the other bullshit is not only happening in the USA. It is occurring in numerous countries across the globe.) What is important, is “common folk” across the globe do not fall for all the bullshit. When it comes to rioting, I don’t care what color the majority of rioters and looters happen to be, it is wrong. I don’t care what the reason is for rioting and looting, it is wrong. I don’t care if the rioting occurs in a big city or a small town, it is wrong. Who knows why the mainstream media keeps it quiet. It is assumed race is an issue, but most of the riots started by a majority of white folk were due to a football or baseball team winning or losing. That is a seriously, stupid reason to riot and loot. However, rioting over a sporting event may hinder the NFL or the MLB and maybe that is enough to keep it all quiet, who knows and who cares. The reason I say who cares, is not to belittle any of the rioting, but no matter the minor reasons for picking and choosing what goes national and what doesn’t is small time compared to the main reason which has always been controlling the masses.


How better to control the masses than with news and information. If you want to create a race war the national news needs to make one race bad compared to another race. If the mainstream media only pushes black riots, people who live hundreds of miles away from any riots will only read about what the mainstream media promotes, which is black riots. One cannot blame society for thinking only black people get into riots when the media only makes black riots go national. If you want to blame someone blame the mainstream media or those in charge of it. I say, those in charge of it because for whatever reason all the top news feeds, instantly pick a distracting issue simultaneously. Off shoot news groups join in so many days later, but on day one it is a total coincidence that NBC, CBS, ABC, Headline News and FOX have found the story and all ready to shove it right onto the viral rollercoaster. The mainstream media chooses to promote one over the other. That is why Bill Clinton has gotten away with rape and forcing women to commit whatever sexual acts. If the media was truly fair, Bill Clinton's victims would be getting more attention than Donald Trump’s words.

Take 10% Off First Purchase w/Code: CORN10 - 728 x 90
10% offer ends 9-16-2020. 


When it comes to the so called "balanced news" it is not about reporting all the issues or being objective about it, it is about making sure the scales are properly balanced to control the masses and to create whatever issues in society they feel fit should occur. Who knows why, it could be to keep the masses distracted while different issues are being voted on in the House and Senate. It could be to maintain a distraction while the current government participates in any actions that would upset the majority of the people. The white viewers across the US are not writing to the mainstream media saying “hey I only want you to report about the black crime across the country and ignore the white crime”. No, nobody's writing those letters. The mainstream media is choosing to report one over the other in order to give the people a certain viewpoint about society.


So next time you have an issue about what is in the national news don't point the finger at white people, black people, Republicans or Democrats, point the finger at the mainstream media and hopefully they will listen and maybe one day they will give up the names of those they have been bowing down to for so many years. If that group of people, who have been pulling all the strings, happens to be white that is not all white people, it is that group of white people. If that group happens to be Democrats, it's not all Democrats across the US, it is that group of Democrats. The reason why so many issues never go away, is people spend too much time blaming those who are not at fault. While those who are at fault, sit behind the curtain laughing about everything they manage to get away with.



Hillary's Society

Posted by Jenny Lee on October 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Comments comments (0)

In most cases if one protects the rights of the individuals, the rights of society as a whole will also end up protected. Plus, whose society is Hillary Clinton talking about when she says she wants to “start thinking about what is best for society”? The #media and the Loony Left will jump to say oh this offends this part of society and should be removed, with no care about the other parts of society who are offended by whatever subject’s removal. Unless society is full of nothing but mindless drones, there isn’t anything that would appease 100% of the masses, so ultimately, someone gets to suffer in order to appease someone else. One example is: It is easier for those offended to change the channel than it is for those who want it but can’t find the channel because someone felt they should have the power to take it away. Same goes with products, if one is offended by say a costume, don’t buy it and don’t wear it, but don’t stop everyone else from buying and wearing it. The Righteous Right have their own list of offensive subjects, but in MOST cases they merely turn the channel in disgust or they don’t buy the product and they usually don’t ask to have it banned. Since the Right do tend to think for themselves, more so than the left, they don’t always get along with each other, and when their elected official tries to ban or prohibit something they speak up and say “Hey! I didn’t elect you to reduce my Freedom, but to maintain and increase it.”


Numerous Right Wing stereotypes, fueled by the media and the Loopy Left, are not accurate concerning all or most Republicans. Log Cabin Republicans is a LGBT Republican group. There are Atheist Republicans, Pro Choice Republicans, Pagan Republicans, Black Republicans, Hispanic Republicans and so on. However, the media and the Democrats creating stereotypes, not only creates walls within society it also mentally manipulates people to choose a political party not due to knowledge of the party or any issues but because they are supposed to pick a party according to their stereotype. I am a woman, as per the Democrat Party I should instantly vote for Hillary Clinton, no questions asked about the issues. Similar to what occurred in 2012 when people were being told to vote for Barack Obama because of the color of his skin. Then, to top it off, the left will insult and degrade those who do not vote according to their Democrat stereotype or they will insult and degrade any stereotype that is considered to be Republican. When it comes to voting for any elected official, one should know the issues, the promises and the history of each candidate, not just because one is somehow supposed to vote for them because they fall into a certain stereotype.


When someone tells you society is more important than the individual, think about whether or not you will be an individual who is on the winning or losing end of what Hillary’s liberal society wants in America. Since you are just an individual, Hillary Clinton won’t care when you happen to be on the losing end of whatever issue she is pushing on American society.


Only Liberals can be Racist

Posted by Jenny Lee on October 3, 2016 at 6:00 PM Comments comments (0)

Look at what Allen West, Ben Carson, Sheriff David Clarke, Mia Love and Elbert Guillory, to name a few, deal with on a daily basis. They deal with continuous racial slurs from trolling liberals. Apparently, it is okay for liberals to call them House n****rs, but disagree with Barack Obama and boom you must be a racist. At the end of the day, most liberals care about liberals and that is it. They can cover it up with making it a gender issue or a race issue, but all they care about is keeping their own rich elite politicians in power. There are some old school liberals who still think for themselves, but they are slowly dwindling away or they are no longer batting for the DNC. 

Post-Debate Bounce

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 30, 2016 at 1:30 AM Comments comments (0)

I think the ‘true numbers’ will stay the same during most of the 2016 Presidential Election. When I say ‘true numbers’ I mean the numbers that are not documented, but are the true realistic numbers of the voters. The numbers, no one will know about until voting day.


In 2012 most Republicans did not seem to care for their options. Plus, from the start the mainstream media had already picked Mitt Romney and made sure he rode the wave all the way to being the GOP candidate.


In 2016 the media did not have that privilege. The media instantly put Jeb Bush on the wave, but he was quickly washed out and the media moved on to Marco Rubio. The whole time being forced to give Donald Trump attention. Donald Trump made sure to create enough drama and attention the mainstream media had no choice, but to pay attention to him. Some of his over the top attention getters is one reason so many voters think twice about voting for Trump, but what other option did he have? The mainstream media made their choice and it was not Donald Trump. So, Donald Trump utilized the public. Bloggers started blogging, graphic artists started producing memes, smartphone owners started posting videos and pictures of Donald Trump and his numerous shenanigans. Obama tried to restrict bloggers and smartphone users by restricting online ‘journalism’ to only those who are licensed or certified. However, the people and the First Amendment won, and the mainstream media was forced to report Donald Trump’s activity whether it was good or bad if they wanted their readers and viewers to stick around.


Now that the primaries are over and Donald Trump is the GOP candidate, he is able to mellow out…a bit. At first the mainstream media reported both candidates, then they veered away from Donald Trump, so he tossed in a few attention getters and the media was back. Hillary Clinton started fainting and rather than admit she was sick, she kept it all top secret. She did a better job at keeping her pneumonia or whatever the hell is wrong with her a secret than she did tens of thousands of classified emails. Since she was constantly missing in action, the media had no choice but to report about Donald Trump. It was either that or act as if there was no presidential election this year. They could have increased their attention toward Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, but why would the mainstream media give a 3rd party a chance to earn their spot in the debates?


Ultimately 2016 is not a flip a coin decision. Both candidates are totally different, even though the media would like everyone to think they only differ by gender or to be more specific, male/female reproductive organs. To start most of their issues are on opposite sides of the political spectrum. Hillary is government sector and Trump is private sector. Hillary is a hard core Democrat and Trump is a Right Leaning Independent. Hillary being in the political arena, even as first lady and as a politician’s daughter, has made many of her political choices and issues official by voting yes or no in the senate, making political speeches, and so on. Most of Trump’s history on issues and political choices are not official. Some of the Trump quotes used by the left were nothing more than lines from a script for his reality show, publicity radio segments and hosting beauty pageants. Who knows what his words would have been back in the day if he was also going to make a vote that would affect the lives of millions. Odds are he would have done more than just read the script or make a joke about it, since his goal before running for office was to bring in more viewers and customers.


Now that he is making the switch from private sector to public sector he is catching up on many issues. When he first started campaigning one could tell most of the information he had was from the same source everyone else depended on, the mainstream media. Now he has had the chance to find out more in-depth information and have the opportunity to visit with foreign leaders and ask about US/foreign issues not just where to put the next hotel/casino with a golf course.


The “post-debate bounce” may not occur in the media polls. Most people are set in their vote and this election may have less undecided voters than most Presidential Elections.

Free Priority Shipping over $59 at!

(Free Shipping offer ends: 1-31-2017)

There is No Excuse to not need an ID to Vote

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 26, 2016 at 4:25 AM Comments comments (0)

There is no need to stop people from needing a valid ID to vote, other than to allow voter fraud to occur or to participate in such fraud. The left argues that the disabled or those in poverty cannot obtain a driver’s license, but there is a list of possible IDs. Texas offers 7 possible forms of photo ID and if one cannot afford a Texas ID at $16 they can make a request for it to be less and pay in installments. If one can give a good reason to not be able to acquire a valid photo ID, there are 7 non-photo ID options which includes a birth certificate, a paycheck stub, a government check stub or a current utility bill. No matter how easy a state has made it to acquire a valid ID for voting, the left has found more and more excuses including their worn out Race Card. Not because they care, not because they are promoting democracy, but to force their choices on others and promote tyranny in the form of voter fraud.

Ted Cruz Endorses Donald Trump

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 25, 2016 at 4:00 AM Comments comments (0)

Ted Cruz had no choice, but to endorse Donald Trump. I mean what is he going to do, be a Republican and tell people to not vote or to vote for someone in another political party? His choices included switching to another political party, quitting his political career or supporting the Republican Party. His career is not over, everyone says it is but politicians have survived worse and voters forget, that is why so many politicians keep getting re-elected over and over by voters who usually forget rather than forgive. Plus, most voters only vote every four years when it comes time to vote for President. People complain about the politicians not doing their jobs, but the voters don't do theirs either.

Never Trump equals 4 Years of Hillary

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 24, 2016 at 7:45 AM Comments comments (0)

It is not to limit people to only voting for Donald Trump. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are still options, but don’t push for others to join into the Never Trump philosophy. Don’t vote for Hillary Clinton in order to stop Trump, as if she is going to be any better. Ted Cruz finally endorsed Trump, and at this point in the campaign Johnson and Stein don’t have the numbers to beat Trump or Hillary. Hillary Clinton has promised to maintain Barack Obama’s agenda and fulfill whatever goals he has not achieved. If Trump was not your first choice, oh well, there is no promise everything will always work out in your favor, but don’t get pissy, have a temper tantrum and help Hillary win.


The Perfect Rug - 3 - 728x90


Madeleine Albrights push for Refugees

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 22, 2016 at 3:20 AM Comments comments (0)

I got an email from the White House with Madeleine Albright's name as the sender, pushing to support Barack Obama’s want to bring in more refugees. It talks about how she was a refugee at the age of 11, escaping…get this…. communism! If that is so, why in God’s Green Earth and Zeus’ butthole would she support a big controlling government?! Oh wait, I know why, because she has had a chance to see both sides of the social ladder and socialism & communism works out great from the top, but sucks at the bottom.

Albright's father, Josef Korbel, believed in Freedom and the American way of life. When Czechoslovakia went communist him and his family were shoved to the bottom of the barrel and raced to the USA to escape possible prosecution. Now she runs with the party that pushes for socialism and she must love living close to the top of the ladder.

I would say she may be happier in Czechoslovakia, but their communist reign ended in 1989 with the help of Ronald Reagan who Czechoslovakia and other countries rescued from communism consider to be the Champion of Freedom. As for her email pushing to bring in more refugees, her own refugee status back in the day does not compare. Her father being a diplomat allowed the USA to easily check her background even in 1948, but the refugees she is pushing to help bring into the USA are not able to have any thorough or publicly known background check.

Dove Channel

Dove Offer ends August 3, 2017

Oh my! Trump called a Bomb a Bomb!

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 18, 2016 at 2:40 PM Comments comments (0)

A bomb goes off in New York and New Jersey in one day and all the Mainstream Media (MSM) seems to care about is Donald Trump labeled an explosion a bomb before it was ‘officially’ confirmed. The left is using his quick to call it a bomb a reason to not elect him as President. As if Obama instantly taking the side of a criminal and instigating racial division and hatred for cops in the USA was totally Presidential. Obama took the side of people who had long criminal histories over that of a police officers within hours of the events. Hillary blamed a crappy B-Flick porno for all the violence in Benghazi. I would rather a person call a bomb a bomb before it is officially confirmed than take a criminal’s side in a police shooting before knowing all the facts or flat out lie to create some ‘wacky’ cover-up about violent riots.

$10 Off Orders $50 or More

Offer ends December 8, 2017

ABC New York reports Hillary Clinton's Death

Posted by Jenny Lee on September 13, 2016 at 8:35 AM Comments comments (0)

ABC out of New York has broadcasted an alert news announcement that Hillary Clinton has died and then the feed was quickly cut. So who knows, either a broadcasting screw up or a DNC cover up in the works. Hillary called the GOP wacky, but I don't think any political party can get any wackier than the current shenanigans going on with the DNC.

Now for a quick FYI, if by chance, Hillary drops out or kicks the bucket odds are Bernie Sanders will not step in as the DNC candidate. Her replacement will be decided by a group of DNC delegates. Not sure if it will be the current super delegates or if they will choose a new group of delegates, but either way her replacement will not be decided by the Democrat voters. My guess would be Tim Kaine or Joe Biden.

The Hillary Token

Posted by Jenny Lee on August 7, 2016 at 4:00 AM Comments comments (0)

Hillary Clinton is the DNC choice because one, she most likely has blackmail information on a number of people. Two, those who expose the truth about her keep ending up dead and three, she makes for a good gender card. The Democrats will probably keep going down the line with LGBT, Hispanic, Asian, Middle Easterner and so on. Unless their voters can band together and go against the DNC establishment. They will most likely all be tokens and puppets just like Obama has been since 2008 & if some horrifying event occurred and Hillary were elected she would be their next puppet. I mean come on, being a puppet can’t be all bad. Make some speeches, travel the world, fly around in Airforce One, gourmet chef in the kitchen, yearly six figure retirement. Who wouldn’t want to be the next lucky puppet? And then the DNC can turn around and go, “lookie, we care about everyone; because, we made sure we nominated a puppet for every possible card.”

Media Polls: Today's Divination

Posted by Jenny Lee on May 22, 2016 at 9:05 PM Comments comments (0)

When people agree with the results they will support and defend their accuracy, but at the end of the day it is a mathematical equation. An equation that relies on the number of participants compared to the number of people it is representing. Most media polls utilize less than 1% of the people they are representing and any accuracy is sheer luck. Many #media outlets will claim a poll has been accurate since 1975 for example, but technically every poll that flip flops the outcome all the way to the finish line can be considered accurate. They may have been wrong 3 times, but they were also correct 3 times. Don’t be swayed or influenced by media polls. They are media tools to create drama, increase ratings & sway people’s choices and opinions." target="_blank">

The History of Ridiculing American Presidents

Posted by Jenny Lee on May 17, 2016 at 10:55 PM Comments comments (0)

Every time I turn around people are still flashing the race card to anyone who accuses President Barack Obama of anything. They will claim that Obama is the only President ever ridiculed because he is black. Well, for one he is also white and second he is not the only President to be ridiculed. He just happens to be the only President who has spent his entire Presidency dealing with billions upon billions of people across the world that has the ability to speak publicly about the current President.

President George Washington did not deal with television, radio or the World Wide Web (www.) during his eight years as President of the USA. He dealt with word of mouth, handwritten newspapers, theatrical plays and public protests. Other than that he didn’t really know how the people felt about him.

President John Quincy Adams was the first President to deal with being photographed, but he was not photographed until 14 years after his Presidency. The first sitting President to be photographed was William Henry Harrison in 1841. Even then cameras were very bulky, produced smoke and made so much noise the photographs could be easily confiscated and destroyed if taken during an embarrassing moment. Instant cameras were not invented until the late 1940s and they were still bulky and noisy. Plus photographs could not be easily manipulated like they can today.

When it comes to film the first motion picture was in 1890 and did not include audio. As for the first President to be filmed, that would be Grover Cleveland in 1897, when he was swearing in William McKinley, but the video did not include any sound. Audio and video did not come together until the late 1920s.

The first sitting President to deal with public voice over the air radio was Warren Harding. However, public radio didn’t become more popular until the 1930s, during President Herbert Hoover’s candidacy. By 1941 audio and video came together to be viewed in what is known as a television set, making Franklin D. Roosevelt the first President to deal with being seen and criticized publically in audio and video in people’s homes. The invention of the radio and the television brought about the ability to communicate one’s opinions on a mass level, but still with limitations. Not everyone had the opportunity to be heard and their voice didn’t carry further than the shore line unless film or audio recording were physically shipped across the ocean, at least until 1962 when satellites were used to broadcast over the Atlantic Ocean. Many shows, music videos and songs were made that disagreed with the Presidents. In 1974 Phil Ochs protested Richard Nixon with a song that was put on audio and video for many people to see and hear. In 1975 Saturday Night Live (SNL) was born and made fun of numerous Presidents starting with Gerald Ford, the sitting President at the time. The only President to not deal with the ridicule of SNL from the start of his Presidency was Barack Obama. SNL finally included him in 2014, two years into his second term. The fear of being labeled racist may have been one of the reasons for waiting so long, but not including him would also be looked at as racist in a reversed sense. Some have said it was because they agreed with his actions, but SNL has been known to ridicule Presidents for minor reasons no matter their party affiliation. In 1982 an HBO series by the name of Not Necessarily the News came out making fun of numerous subjects including Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush the two sitting Presidents during the time span of the show. In 1986 the band Genesis made a hit song and music video called “Land of Confusion” making fun of Ronald Reagan and the political issues with Russia and other Nations. In 1988 the Austin Lounge Lizards made a song and video against Ronald Reagan named “The Balad of Ronald Reagan”. In 1999, 2Pac & the Outlaws created “Letter to the President” making their disappointment in Bill Clinton public. Television opened the door for many people to find a way to be heard; however, it depended on big media, building a huge fan base or any other method of making one’s name known to the public first. When compared to the population of the world only a select few had the privilege of being heard on a mass level.

President Richard Nixon was the first sitting President to deal with being criticized in the form of email. In 1971 mass communications reached a new level with the first use of email. Email allowed people to be heard by larger groups and without depending on big media to open the door. One had the ability to start a newsletter and build a subscriber list. When it first started it only consisted of text, but quickly gained the ability to set up HTML and add attachments, allowing people to move more information around the world. However, people who chose to spam their way to success put a huge dent in email. Spam guards were added to email services dumping not only true spam, but also tossing newsletters into a spam folder never to be seen by its subscriber. Email also had its limitations and people moved on to faster methods of communication.

President Ronald Reagan was the first sitting President to be criticized in text messages with the startup of IRC (Internet Relay Chat) in 1988, allowing people from across the globe to communicate with each other via text. Unlike email where a response could take hours or days until it was read and responded, chat was instant. People who were communicating with each other were both sitting at a computer having a cyber conversation with not just one person but in many cases one or more people within the same chat channel or also called chat rooms. Now most chat rooms are integrated into online gaming and social sites.

President George H.W. Bush was the first sitting President to be publically criticized on the World Wide Web. In 1991 the World Wide Web (www) was born, but it didn’t instantly take over the population. Personal computers were not cheap and the internet did not have near the speed it has today, or the number of websites to visit. As the years went by more companies started creating their own websites. The World Wide Web also opened doors individuals could utilize to create their own websites, blogs and online stores. However, the problem with websites and blogs is finding ways to get people to visit their sites. Building traffic was not as easy as people thought, and all the hard work to be heard by the masses did not always bring in promising results.

President Bill Clinton was the first sitting President to be criticized at a public social site. Six Degrees was one of or the first social sites that stuck around from 1997 to 2001. The site did bring in millions of members, but the internet was still somewhat new and not utilized by the number of people using it today. Bill Clinton was the last sitting President to enjoy the silence of the general public. The only time the public was heard was when the media felt it was worth reporting or someone had the ability to write a novel, a movie or a song about him.

President George W. Bush had the privilege of being the first sitting President to be criticized at some of the most popular social sites, where millions of people had the ability to publically post their opinions to millions of other people across the planet. MySpace came about in 2003; a year later in 2004 Facebook popped up, in 2005 YouTube supplied streaming videos and in 2006 Twitter opened its cyber doors to the world. People instantly started using their Paint and Photoshop programs to create one meme after another to either show their support or to protest. If his memes do not outnumber Obama’s it had nothing to do with race, it had to do with the number of people not only using the social sites, but able to create memes to begin with. Plus the listed social sites were not around during all eight years of his Presidency.

President Barack Obama is the first sitting President to enjoy the huge online picture book known as Pinterest who opened their cyber doors in 2009. President Barack Obama enduring a large amount of public criticism is not due to his racial background. It is due to the number of people who have the ability to make their opinions public. People no longer have to turn in a resume at a huge media network and hope they are hired or run for a political office hoping to be elected in order to be heard. People now have the ability to start their own blog, jump into chat rooms, create their own graphic work and so on. And yes, some of those non-black folk who are able to post their opinions publically are going to make rude and racist comments about Obama. Just like many non-white folk make rude and racist comments about George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and most likely every President as far back as George Washington. It doesn’t make any of it right, but unless one wants the government to step in and take away the people’s Freedom of Speech and their Freedom of Opinion, there will always be someone in the world that someone else does not agree with, and there will always be someone who is offended.

And with that said, President Obama may be the first President to endure a full candidacy with the People finding ways to be heard on a mass level, but he will not be the last. Future Presidents will endure the same pain as long as the People maintain their freedom of speech and their freedom to utilize the internet.


It is a Big Political Show

Posted by Jenny Lee on April 23, 2016 at 1:25 AM Comments comments (0)

Trump team tells GOP: he has been ‘projecting an image’. Do people think otherwise? Do people really think when Obama sheds a tear on cue it is authentic? Ted Cruz might read Dr. Suess during all his White House press conferences if elected?

Obama utilized a large number of celebrities during his campaigning because they are able to act on camera and in front of crowds. If people think everything they see any politician, no matter the party affiliation, is doing in the public eye is 100% authentic they need to stamp “GULLIBLE” on their forehead. But if they were to take the ‘show’ away, nobody would watch them. The Republican debates have had huge audiences this year. Why? People wanted to see them fight and argue with each other. When did the DNC debate audience increase? After Hillary and Bernie had a tiff.